kdee/miSim
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

'

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Kevin Dee
2026-01-27 21:46:40 -08:00
parent a68690a5cf
commit 03fae7077c
58 changed files with 214 additions and 213 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

10
test/test_sigmoidSensor.m
View File

@@ -41,21 +41,21 @@ classdef test_sigmoidSensor < matlab.unittest.TestCase
% Anticipate perfect performance for a point directly below and
% extremely close
tc.verifyEqual(tc.testClass.sensorPerformance([0, 0, h], 0, [0, 0, 0]), 1, 'RelTol', 1e-3);
tc.verifyEqual(tc.testClass.sensorPerformance([0, 0, h], [0, 0, 0]), 1, "RelTol", 1e-3);
% It looks like mu_t can max out at really low values like 0.37
% when alphaTilt and betaTilt are small, which seems wrong
% Performance at nadir point, distance alphaDist should be 1/2 exactly
tc.verifyEqual(tc.testClass.sensorPerformance([0, 0, alphaDist], 0, [0, 0, 0]), 1/2);
tc.verifyEqual(tc.testClass.sensorPerformance([0, 0, alphaDist],[0, 0, 0]), 1/2);
% Performance at (almost) 0 distance, alphaTilt should be 1/2
tc.verifyEqual(tc.testClass.sensorPerformance([0, 0, h], 0, [tand(alphaTilt)*h, 0, 0]), 1/2, 'RelTol', 1e-3);
tc.verifyEqual(tc.testClass.sensorPerformance([0, 0, h], [tand(alphaTilt)*h, 0, 0]), 1/2, "RelTol", 1e-3);
% Performance at great distance should be 0
tc.verifyEqual(tc.testClass.sensorPerformance([0, 0, 10], 0, [0, 0, 0]), 0, 'AbsTol', 1e-9);
tc.verifyEqual(tc.testClass.sensorPerformance([0, 0, 10], [0, 0, 0]), 0, "AbsTol", 1e-9);
% Performance at great tilt should be 0
tc.verifyEqual(tc.testClass.sensorPerformance([0, 0, h], 0, [5, 5, 0]), 0, 'AbsTol', 1e-9);
tc.verifyEqual(tc.testClass.sensorPerformance([0, 0, h], [5, 5, 0]), 0, "AbsTol", 1e-9);
end
end