better sigmoid sensor unit testing
This commit is contained in:
@@ -33,20 +33,29 @@ classdef test_sigmoidSensor < matlab.unittest.TestCase
|
||||
betaDist = 3;
|
||||
alphaTilt = 15; % degrees
|
||||
betaTilt = 3;
|
||||
h = 1e-6;
|
||||
tc.testClass = tc.testClass.initialize(alphaDist, betaDist, NaN, NaN, alphaTilt, betaTilt);
|
||||
|
||||
% Plot
|
||||
tc.testClass.plotParameters();
|
||||
|
||||
% Performance at current position should be maximized (1)
|
||||
% some wiggle room is needed for certain parameter conditions,
|
||||
% e.g. small alphaDist and betaDist produce mu_d slightly < 1
|
||||
tc.verifyEqual(tc.testClass.sensorPerformance(zeros(1, 3), NaN, 0, zeros(1, 3)), 1, 'AbsTol', 1e-3);
|
||||
% Anticipate perfect performance for a point directly below and
|
||||
% extremely close
|
||||
tc.verifyEqual(tc.testClass.sensorPerformance([0, 0, h], NaN, 0, [0, 0, 0]), 1, 'RelTol', 1e-3);
|
||||
% It looks like mu_t can max out at really low values like 0.37
|
||||
% when alphaTilt and betaTilt are small, which seems wrong
|
||||
|
||||
% Performance at distance alphaDist should be 1/2
|
||||
tc.verifyEqual(tc.testClass.sensorPerformance([0, 0, alphaDist], NaN, 0, [0, 0, 0]), 1/2, 'AbsTol', 1e-3);
|
||||
% Performance at nadir point, distance alphaDist should be 1/2 exactly
|
||||
tc.verifyEqual(tc.testClass.sensorPerformance([0, 0, alphaDist], NaN, 0, [0, 0, 0]), 1/2);
|
||||
|
||||
% Performance at (almost) 0 distance, alphaTilt should be 1/2
|
||||
tc.verifyEqual(tc.testClass.sensorPerformance([0, 0, h], NaN, 0, [tand(alphaTilt)*h, 0, 0]), 1/2, 'RelTol', 1e-3);
|
||||
|
||||
% Performance at great distance should be 0
|
||||
tc.verifyEqual(tc.testClass.sensorPerformance([0, 0, 10], NaN, 0, [0, 0, 0]), 0, 'AbsTol', 1e-9);
|
||||
|
||||
% Performance at great tilt should be 0
|
||||
tc.verifyEqual(tc.testClass.sensorPerformance([0, 0, h], NaN, 0, [5, 5, 0]), 0, 'AbsTol', 1e-9);
|
||||
end
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user